Williams v. Romero et al
Filing
208
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 11/22/2024 DENYING 207 "Motion to grant default victory." (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LANCE WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ROMERO, et al.,
15
No. 2:17-cv-1884 TLN SCR P
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.
18
§1983. Plaintiff has filed a “Motion to grant default victory.” (ECF No. 207.) Plaintiff asks for
19
judgment to be entered in his favor due to defendants’ failure to respond to discovery he
20
propounded on July 18, 2024.
21
Based on defendants’ addition of a witness, Michael Orlandi, the court permitted plaintiff
22
to conduct discovery regarding Mr. Orlandi through August 30. (ECF Nos. 202, 204.) As set out
23
in the court’s Discovery and Scheduling Orders, discovery should have been propounded so that
24
responses were received fifteen days prior to the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 50 at 5; ECF No.
25
123 at 6.) Responses to discovery were due within forty-five days of service of the discovery
26
requests. Therefore, even giving plaintiff some leeway due to his pro se status, plaintiff should
27
have served defendants with discovery no later than July 16 so that their responses were due by
28
August 30. Further, the discovery deadline includes filing any motions to compel discovery.
1
1
(Id.) If defendants failed to respond to discovery, plaintiff’s remedy was a motion to compel
2
defendants to respond. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. Plaintiff is obviously aware of that requirement.
3
He has filed multiple motions to compel in this case. (See ECF Nos. 60, 71, 137.)
4
5
6
Plaintiff’s challenge to defendants’ alleged failure to respond to discovery is untimely and
judgment will not be entered in plaintiff’s failure on that basis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “Motion to grant default victory”
7
(ECF No. 207) is denied.
8
Dated: November 22, 2024
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?