Candler v. Baker, et al.,

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2019 GRANTING 30 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff to have 14 days from the date of this order within which to file an opposition to 28 Motion for Summary Judgement. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEITH CANDLER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-1885 AC P

v.

ORDER

BAKER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On July 8, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion for a fourteen-day extension of time to file an

17
18

opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 30. In support of the motion,

19

plaintiff states that he needs more time to research and organize his opposition. See id. He also

20

states that as an inmate in maximum security housing, programming is often shut down, which

21

prevents him from having access to the jailhouse lawyer who is assisting him with this action.

22

See id. Limited programming and sharing of facilities have also reduced his opportunities to

23

access to the law library. See id.

24

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, filed July 8, 2019 (ECF No. 30), is

26

GRANTED, and

27

////

28

////

1

2. Plaintiff shall have fourteen days from the date of this order within which to file an

2

opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed

3

within seven days thereafter.

4

DATED: July 9, 2019.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2