Candler v. Baker, et al.,

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2020 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full, and GRANTING 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH CANDLER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-1885 KJM AC P v. ORDER BAKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 11, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 43. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued March 11, 2020 (ECF No. 40) are 3 4 5 ADOPTED in full, and 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED. DATED: September 30, 2020. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 cand1885.805 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?