Candler v. Baker, et al.,
Filing
44
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/30/2020 ADOPTING 40 Findings and Recommendations in full, and GRANTING 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEITH CANDLER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1885 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
BAKER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 11, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 40. Plaintiff has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 43.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations issued March 11, 2020 (ECF No. 40) are
3
4
5
ADOPTED in full, and
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED.
DATED: September 30, 2020.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
cand1885.805
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?