Candler v. Baker, et al.,

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/11/2017 GRANTING 8 Motion for Extension of Time. The court will screen plaintiff's first amended complaint by separate order and Defendants' answer due 30 days from the date the court enters its new screening order. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH CANDLER, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1885 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER BAKER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Defendants have filed a motion for extension of time to file an answer to the amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Defendants’ motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 8) is granted; 20 2. The court will screen plaintiff’s first amended complaint by separate order; and 21 3. Defendants’ answer to the first amended complaint shall be due thirty days from the 22 date the court enters its new screening order. 23 DATED: October 11, 2017 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?