Evans v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Filing 12

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/6/2017 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD ANTHONY EVANS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-1891 KJN P

v.

ORDER and FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,

16

Defendant.

17
By order filed October 30, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

18
19

to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

20

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

21
22

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this

23
24

case.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1

1

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

3

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: December 6, 2017

5
6
7

/eva1891.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2