CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu

Filing 106

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/3/2018 GRANTING 103 motion for leave to file a sur-reply. The sur-reply filed on 9/16/2018 (ECF No. 103-1) shall be considered; and The 10/12/2018 hearing of defendant's motion is VACATED. (York, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION, 12 No. 2:17-cv-1895 MCE DB PS Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ZHIXIANG HU, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. (ECF No. 68.) Accordingly, this action has 17 18 been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On September 16, 2018, defendant filed a motion for leave to file a sur-reply along with a 19 20 sur-reply. (ECF No. 103.) The motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on October 21 12, 2018. (ECF No. 105.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230, any opposition to the motion was to be 22 filed on or before September 28, 2018. However, no opposition to defendant’s motion has been 23 filed. Accordingly, upon consideration of the arguments on file and for the reasons set forth 24 25 above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s September 16, 2018 motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 103) is 26 27 granted; 28 //// 1 1 2. The sur-reply filed on September 16, 2018 (ECF No. 103-1) shall be considered; and 2 3. The October 12, 2018 hearing of defendant’s motion is vacated. 3 Dated: October 3, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.pro se\cspc1895.sur.reply.ord 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?