CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu
Filing
106
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/3/2018 GRANTING 103 motion for leave to file a sur-reply. The sur-reply filed on 9/16/2018 (ECF No. 103-1) shall be considered; and The 10/12/2018 hearing of defendant's motion is VACATED. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION,
12
No. 2:17-cv-1895 MCE DB PS
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ZHIXIANG HU,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se. (ECF No. 68.) Accordingly, this action has
17
18
been referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On September 16, 2018, defendant filed a motion for leave to file a sur-reply along with a
19
20
sur-reply. (ECF No. 103.) The motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on October
21
12, 2018. (ECF No. 105.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230, any opposition to the motion was to be
22
filed on or before September 28, 2018. However, no opposition to defendant’s motion has been
23
filed.
Accordingly, upon consideration of the arguments on file and for the reasons set forth
24
25
above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s September 16, 2018 motion for leave to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 103) is
26
27
granted;
28
////
1
1
2. The sur-reply filed on September 16, 2018 (ECF No. 103-1) shall be considered; and
2
3. The October 12, 2018 hearing of defendant’s motion is vacated.
3
Dated: October 3, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.pro se\cspc1895.sur.reply.ord
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?