CSPC Dophen Corporation v. Hu

Filing 179

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/20/2019 CONTINUING the 149 , 152 , 154 Motions to Quash and 155 Motion to Enforce Subpoena Hearings to 5/17/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. 157 , 158 , 159 Motions to Quash are WITHDRAWN and taken off calendar. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BRYAN WILSON (SBN 138842) BWilson@mofo.com YUE LI (SBN 287280) YLi@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: 650.813.5600 5 6 7 8 C. JASON SMITH (SBN 237966) cjsmith@smplawcorp.com SMITH, MCDOWELL & POWELL A LAW CORPORATION 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 208 South Sacramento, California 95825 Telephone: 916-569-8100 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION and NonParties ASHLEY SMITH, CONJUPRO BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., and YINGUI LI 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 16 CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 v. ZHIXIANG HU, also known as SEAN HU, an individual, No. 2:17-cv-01895-MCE-DB AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS 20 Defendant. 21 22 ZHIXIANG HU, also known as SEAN HU, an individual 23 24 25 26 Counter-Claimant, v. CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION, a New Jersey Corporation, Counter-Defendant. 27 28 AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01895-MCE-DB pa-1888241 Plaintiff CSPC Dophen Corporation (“CSPC Dophen”) and Defendant Sean Hu, through 1 2 their counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on January 31, 2019, non-party Ashley Smith filed a motion to quash the 3 4 subpoena issued by Dr. Hu to Wells Fargo Bank (ECF No. 149); WHEREAS, on February 7, 2019, non-party Conjupro Biotherapeutics, Inc. (“Conjupro”) 5 6 filed a motion to quash the subpoena issued by Dr. Hu to JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 152); 7 WHEREAS, on February 8, 2019, non-party Yingui Li filed a motion to quash the 8 subpoena issued by Dr. Hu to East West Bank and HSBC Bank (ECF No. 154); WHEREAS, on February 8, 2019, Dr. Hu filed a motion to enforce subpoena against 9 10 JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 155); WHEREAS, on February 8, 2019, ADCure Biomed Inc. filed a motion to quash the 11 12 subpoena issued by CSPC Dophen to JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 157); WHEREAS, on February 8, 2019, Jiaying Fan filed a motion to quash the subpoena 13 14 issued by CSPC Dophen to JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 158); WHEREAS, on February 8, 2019, Dr. Hu filed a motion to quash the subpoena issued by 15 16 CSPC Dophen to JPMorgan Chase Bank (ECF No. 159); WHEREAS, on February 26, 2019, the Court continued the hearing of the above motions, 17 18 originally set for March 1, 2019 and March 8, 2019, to March 22, 2019 (ECF No. 171); 19 WHEREAS, on March 6, 2019, the Court granted attorney Jack Duran, Jr.’s substitution 20 of attorney on behalf of defendant Sean Hu and referred this matter back to the assigned District 21 Judge Morrison C. England; WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred on the above motions and agreed to the 22 23 following: 24 The hearing date for the above motions (ECF Nos. 149, 152, 154, and 155) shall be 25 continued to May 17, 2019 to allow the parties to additional time to meet and confer on the 26 issues; 27 28 The motions filed by Dr. Hu, Jiaying Fang, and ADCure Biomed Inc. (ECF Nos. 157-59) be withdrawn and taken off calendar. AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01895-MCE-DB pa-1888241 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 1 2 Dated: March 19, 2019 3 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 4 By: 5 /s/ Yue Li Yue Li 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant CSPC DOPHEN CORPORATION and Non-Parties ASHLEY SMITH, CONJUPRO BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., and YINGUI LI 7 8 9 10 Dated: March 19, 2019 DURAN LAW OFFICE 11 12 By: /s/ Jack Duran, Jr. Jack Duran, Jr. 13 Attorneys for Defendant and CounterClaimant ZHIXIANG HU and Non-Parties JIAYING FANG, and ADCURE BIOMED INC. 14 15 16 ORDER 17 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.1 18 19 20 Dated: March 20, 2019 21 22 23 24 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.civil\cspc1895.stip.cont.hrg.ord 25 26 27 28 1 Prior to the hearing of any of the continued motions, the parties shall file new briefing that complies with the Local Rules and the undersigned’s Standard Information, and that briefing will supersede any prior briefing filed in connection with those motions. AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISCOVERY MOTIONS CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01895-MCE-DB pa-1888241 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?