Blackman v. Tisher et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/27/2018 ADOPTING the 10 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is served. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this action. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY BLACKMAN,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1926-JAM EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
FRANCISCH P. TISHER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 3, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 3, 2018, are adopted in full;
28
2. Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied;
1
1
2
3. Plaintiff is directed to pay the filing of $400.00 in full within twenty-one (21) days
from the date this order is served; and
3
4
4. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this
action.
5
6
7
DATED: September 27, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?