Washington v. Rashid et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/22/2018 DENYING 19 Request for Ruling. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TYREE WASHINGTON,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-01934-TLN-CKD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

T. RASHID, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On May 4, 2018, the remaining Defendants filed a motion asking that this Court treat the

18

magistrate judge’s January 26, 2018 “screening order” as a “report and recommendation.” In the

19

motion, Defendants assert that in the “screening order” the magistrate judge “dismissed certain

20

Defendants from this action.” (ECF No. 19 at 2.) However, a review of the docket reveals that,

21

the magistrate judge did not dismiss any Defendants on January 26, 2018. Rather, she

22

recommended “that all [D]efendants other than Rashid, Willick, Gonzalez and Jones be

23

dismissed.” That recommendation was adopted by Judge Garland Burrell on February 12, 2018.

24

Accordingly, Defendants’ May 4, 2018 Request for Ruling is DENIED.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 22, 2018

27
28
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge