J'Weial v. County of Amador et al
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/16/22 ADOPTING in full 56 Findings and Recommendations and GRANTING 40 Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Judgment is entered for defendants. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
XAVIER LUMAR J’WEIAL,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1937 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 7, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections
22
thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 56. Neither party has filed objections
23
to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 7, 2022 (ECF No. 56), are
ADOPTED in full.
1
1
2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 40) is GRANTED.
2
3. Judgment is entered for defendants.
3
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: November 16, 2022
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?