Hammler v. Director of CDCR et al
Filing
23
ORDER adopting in full 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 4/30/18. Plaintiff's 7 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's 10 motion for class certification is DENIED. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DISMISSED as a defendant. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HAMMLER,
12
No. 2:17-cv-1949 MCE DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
DIRECTOR OF CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 14, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. However, plaintiff has filed a response
24
to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 21.)
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
////
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 14, 2018 (ECF No. 14), are adopted in
full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 7) is denied;
4
3. Plaintiff’s motion for class certification (ECF No. 10) is denied; and
5
4. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is dismissed as a
6
7
8
defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 30, 2018
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?