Calkins v. Sanofi S.A. et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER 10 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/28/2017 extending time for McKesson Corporation to respond to the Complaint 30 days after a determination by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.(Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ERIN M. BOSMAN (CA SBN 204987)
EBosman@mofo.com
JULIE Y. PARK (CA SBN 259929)
JuliePark@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
12531 High Bluff Drive
San Diego, California 92130-2040
Telephone: 858.720.5100
Facsimile: 858.720.5125
Attorneys for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION
d/b/a MCKESSON PACKAGING SERVICES
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROSEMARY CALKINS and LARRY
CALKINS,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
Case No. 2:17-cv-01954-WBS-GGH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
MCKESSON TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
14
15
16
17
18
19
SANOFI S.A., AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.,
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, separately, and
doing business as WINTHROP U.S.,
HOSPIRA WORLDWIDE, INC.; and SUN
PHARMA GLOBAL INC.; and McKESSON
CORPORATION d/b/a McKESSON
PACKAGING; and SANDOZ INC.; and
ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC.; and PFIZER,
INC.; and ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC.; and
NORTHSTAR RX LLC; and EAGLE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
The Honorable William B. Shubb
Case Removed: September 20, 2017
20
Defendants
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MCKESSON’S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5470-WBS-GGH
sd-706830
Plaintiffs Rosemary Calkins and Larry Calkins (“Plaintiffs”) and defendant McKesson
1
2
Corporation d/b/a McKesson Packaging Services (“McKesson”), through their undersigned
3
counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this case on March 30, 2017, in the Superior
4
5
Court of California, Sacramento (Case No. 34-2017-00210317);
6
WHEREAS, McKesson was served on April 6, 2017;
7
WHEREAS, Defendant sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC removed this case to this Court on
8
September 20, 2017;
WHEREAS, McKesson’s deadline to respond to the Complaint is September 27, 2017;
9
WHEREAS, this case is related to the cases pending in a coordinated Multidistrict
10
11
Litigation (MDL) in the Eastern District of Louisiana: In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products
12
Liability Litigation, Case No. 16-md-2740-KDE-MBN (see Notice of Related Cases, ECF No. 3);
WHEREAS, the Parties anticipate that this case will be subject to transfer to the pending
13
14
MDL;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it will conserve the Court’s and the Parties’ resources
15
16
to extend McKesson’s deadline to respond to the Complaint until 30 days after the Judicial Panel
17
on Multidistrict Litigation determines whether this case should be transferred to the pending
18
MDL;
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their counsel, that
20
McKesson’s time to respond to the Complaint shall be extended until 30 days following entry of
21
an order by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation determining whether this case should be
22
transferred to the pending MDL.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MCKESSON’S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5470-WBS-GGH
sd-706830
1
1
Dated: September 26, 2017
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
2
By: /s/ Julie Y. Park
Julie Y. Park
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION d/b/a
MCKESSON PACKAGING SERVICES
5
6
7
Dated: September 26, 2017
GOMEZ TRIAL ATTORNEYS
8
9
By: /s/ Ahmed S. Diab (as authorized on 9/26/17)
Ahmed S. Diab
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PATRICIA STEDTNITZ
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
Dated: September 28, 2017
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING MCKESSON’S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-5470-WBS-GGH
sd-706830
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?