Driver v. Pape Kenworth et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/27/19 EXTENDING date that counsel for Jomar Investments, Inc. may file responsive pleadings to 09/06/19. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
CHARLES S. PAINTER (SBN 89045)
REBECCA L. MENENDEZ (SBN 262487)
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 110 South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8201
(916) 483-5181 Telephone
(916) 483-7558 Facsimile
Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff,
PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ROGER DRIVER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
PAPÉ KENWORTH; THE PAPÉ GROUP,
INC.; PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC.; PAPÉ
TRUCK LEASING, INC.; PAPÉ
PROPERTIES, INC.; PAPÉ MATERIAL
HANDLING, INC.; PAPÉ MACHINERY
HANDLING, INC.; ENGINEERED
PRODUCTS, A PAPÉ COMPANY ; PAPÉ
D.W., INC.; and DOES 1-100
14
15
16
17
18
19
Defendants.
___________________________________
PAPE TRUCKS, INC.,
Third Party Plaintiff,
20
21
22
23
24
Vs.
JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC. dba NEW
LIFE TRANSPORT PARTS CENTER, and
ROES 1-10, Inclusive,
Third Party Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 2:17-CV-01968- KJN
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT JOMAR
INVESTMENTS, INC. TO FILE A
RESPONSIVE PLEADING; ORDER
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS the complaint was filed on September 21, 2017.
WHEREAS Defendant filed a Third Party Complaint against Jomar Investments, Inc.
dba New Life Transport Parts Center on June 27, 2019.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR JOMAR
INVESTMENTS, INC. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING;
ORDER
17-089/PLEADING.015
- 1 RLM:sj
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, the Third Party Complaint was served on July 19, 2019 on Jomar
Investments, Inc.
WHEREAS counsel for Jomar Investments, Inc. has requested an extension of time to
file responsive pleadings.
5
WHEREAS Local Rule 144 (a) states: Unless the filing date has been set by order
6
of the Court, an initial stipulation extending time for no more than twenty-eight (28) days
7
to respond to a complaint, cross-claim or counterclaim, or to respond to interrogatories,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
requests for admissions, or requests for production of documents may be filed without
approval of the Court if the stipulation is signed on behalf of all parties who have appeared
in the action and are affected by the stipulation. All other extensions of time must be
approved by the Court. No open extensions of time by stipulation of the parties will be
recognized.
The parties do hereby agree and stipulate between and amongst themselves, through
15
their respective counsel that counsel for Jomar Investments, Inc. may have an extension of time
16
until September 6, 2019 to file responsive pleadings.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
DATED: August 23, 2019
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
19
20
By
CHARLES S. PAINTER
REBECCA L. MENENDEZ
Attorneys for Defendant/Third Party
Plaintiff,
PAPÉ TRUCKS, INC.
21
22
23
24
DATED: August 23, 2019
WOOD SMITH HENNING & BERMAN,
LLP
25
26
27
28
By
CARLA N. BRAUNSTEIN
Attorneys for Third Party Defendant,
JOMAR INVESTMENTS, INC.
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR JOMAR
INVESTMENTS, INC. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING;
ORDER
17-089/PLEADING.015
- 2 RLM:sj
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED:
3
Dated: August 27, 2019
4
5
driv.1968
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR JOMAR
INVESTMENTS, INC. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING;
ORDER
17-089/PLEADING.015
- 3 RLM:sj
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?