Molina v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/15/24 GRANTING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees and Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $20,570.00 in attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 406(b). Upon payment of the fees sought herein, counsel shall refund plaintiff the amount of $5,600.00 previously awarded under EAJA. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LELANI MOLINA,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:17-cv-01991-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
17
18
Based on 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), counsel for plaintiff in the above-entitled action seeks an
19
award of attorney fees in the amount of $20,570.00 for 37.4 hours of professional time devoted to
20
the representation of plaintiff before this court. ECF No. 22. Counsel concedes that this amount
21
should be offset by $5,600.00 in fees previously awarded under EAJA. See ECF No. 21.
22
Defendant has filed a response and does not oppose the amount requested. ECF No. 24.
23
24
25
26
27
28
42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A) provides, in relevant part:
Whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under
this subchapter who was represented before the court by an attorney,
the court may determine and allow as part of its judgment a
reasonable fee for such representation, not in excess of 25 percent of
the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by
reason of such judgment.
Rather than being paid by the government, fees under the Social Security Act are awarded out of
1
1
the claimant’s disability benefits. Russell v. Sullivan, 930 F.2d 1443, 1446 (9th Cir. 1991),
2
receded from on other grounds, Sorenson v. Mink, 239 F.3d 1140, 1149 (9th Cir. 2001).
3
However, the 25 percent statutory maximum fee is not an automatic entitlement; the court also
4
must ensure that the requested fee is reasonable. Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808-09
5
(2002) (“We hold that § 406(b) does not displace contingent-fee agreements within the statutory
6
ceiling; instead, § 406(b) instructs courts to review for reasonableness fees yielded by those
7
agreements.”). “Within the 25 percent boundary ... the attorney for the successful claimant must
8
show that the fee sought is reasonable for the services rendered.” Id. at 807.
9
Counsel seeks fees for 37.4 hours of representation in the instant action, which resulted in
10
a judgment for plaintiff and a remand for further proceedings. See ECF No. 18. The Court has
11
considered the character of counsel’s representation and the good results achieved by counsel,
12
which included an award of $93,208.00 in retroactive benefits. See ECF Nos. 22 at 3, n.1 & 22-2.
13
Counsel submitted a detailed billing statement that supports her request. ECF No. 22-3. There is
14
no indication that a reduction of the award is warranted due to any substandard performance by
15
plaintiff’s counsel, as counsel secured a successful result. There is also no evidence that
16
plaintiff’s counsel engaged in any dilatory conduct resulting in delay.
17
Based on the quality of counsel’s representation and the results achieved in this case, the
18
undersigned finds the number of hours expended to be reasonable. Accordingly, the undersigned
19
will award the amount of attorney fees requested.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1. Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 22) is granted; and
22
2. Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded $20,570.00 in attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
23
406(b). Upon payment of the fees sought herein, counsel shall refund plaintiff the
24
amount of $5,600.00 previously awarded under EAJA.
25
Dated: March 15, 2024
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
2/molina1991.fee-406(a)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?