Stribling v. Lewis
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/2019 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 7/25/2019, in full; GRANTING Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26 ); DISMISSING this action without prejudice; and DIRECTING the Clerk to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AARON LAMONT STRIBLING,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2009-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
LEWIS,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 25, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the pleadings and the record
26
as relevant to the pending motion, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
27
supported by the record and by proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 25, 2019, are adopted in full;
3
2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED;
4
3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
5
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
6
DATED: September 27, 2019.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?