Taylor v. Arnold

Filing 17

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/19/17 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court assign a District Judge to his case. U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrel randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT LEE TAYLOR,

12

No. 2:17-cv-2014 CKD P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

ERIC ARNOLD,

15

ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendant.

16
By order filed November 8, 2017, plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file a

17
18

complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not complied with the court’s

19

order.

20
21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
court judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

28

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: December 19, 2017

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8

1
tayl2014.noc

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2