Huynh et al v. Northbay Medical Center et al
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/25/19 GRANTING 40 Motion to File Electronically. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIA VIVIAN HUYNH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:17-cv-2039-EFB PS
ORDER
NORTHBAY MEDICAL CENTER, TERI
RUSSELL, and JEROLD WILCOX,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff filed an application for an order granting her permission to file documents in this
18
19
case electronically. ECF No. 40. The Local Rules provide that “[a]ny person appearing pro se
20
may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate
21
Judge.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2).
For the reasons stated at the status (pretrial scheduling) conference, plaintiff’s request for
22
23
leave to file electronically is granted. The Clerk of Court will contact plaintiff in order to
24
facilitate her participation in the court’s electronic filing and case management system
25
(“CM/ECF”) system.1
26
/////
27
28
1
However, plaintiff is admonished that an abuse of the CM/ECF system will result in a
revocation of her authorization to file electronically.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to file electronically in this action (ECF No. 40) is
3
4
granted.2
2. The Clerk of Court shall contact plaintiff in order to facilitate her participation in the
5
CM/ECF system.
6
DATED: July 25, 2019.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Because plaintiff has not consented to electronic service, the parties shall continue to
serve documents conventionally in accordance with Local Rules 135(b) and (e).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?