Huynh et al v. Northbay Medical Center et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/25/19 GRANTING 40 Motion to File Electronically. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA VIVIAN HUYNH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:17-cv-2039-EFB PS ORDER NORTHBAY MEDICAL CENTER, TERI RUSSELL, and JEROLD WILCOX, Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed an application for an order granting her permission to file documents in this 18 19 case electronically. ECF No. 40. The Local Rules provide that “[a]ny person appearing pro se 20 may not utilize electronic filing except with the permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate 21 Judge.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). For the reasons stated at the status (pretrial scheduling) conference, plaintiff’s request for 22 23 leave to file electronically is granted. The Clerk of Court will contact plaintiff in order to 24 facilitate her participation in the court’s electronic filing and case management system 25 (“CM/ECF”) system.1 26 ///// 27 28 1 However, plaintiff is admonished that an abuse of the CM/ECF system will result in a revocation of her authorization to file electronically. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to file electronically in this action (ECF No. 40) is 3 4 granted.2 2. The Clerk of Court shall contact plaintiff in order to facilitate her participation in the 5 CM/ECF system. 6 DATED: July 25, 2019. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Because plaintiff has not consented to electronic service, the parties shall continue to serve documents conventionally in accordance with Local Rules 135(b) and (e). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?