Huynh et al v. Northbay Medical Center et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/19 GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 44 Motion to Compel. The motion is GRANTED as to plaintiff's Requests for Production of Documents Numbers 5, 9, 21. Within 7 days, defendants shall provide plaintiff with the hiring dates of the individuals identified in request number 7; the time and attendance records described in request number 9; and documents related to the 3/30/15 incident described in request number 21, including the Kronos for Derick Grinsteiner. The motion is DENIED as to plaintiff's Interrogatories Numbers 1-3. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA VIVIAN HUYNH, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:17-cv-2039-EFB PS ORDER AFTER HEARING NORTHBAY MEDICAL CENTER, TERI RUSSELL, and JEROLD WILCOX, Defendants. 16 17 18 This case was before the court on August 28, 2019, for hearing on plaintiff’s motion to 19 compel defendants to provide further responses to discovery requests. ECF No. 44. Attorney 20 Amanda Iler appeared on behalf of defendants, and plaintiff appeared pro se. For the reasons 21 stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion is granted in part and denied 22 in part as follows: 23 24 25 1. The motion is granted as to plaintiff’s Requests for Production of Documents Numbers 5, 9, 21. 2. Within 7 days of this order, defendants shall provide plaintiff with: the hiring dates of 26 the individuals identified in request number 7; the time and attendance records described in 27 request number 9; and documents related to the March 30, 2015 incident described in request 28 number 21, including the Kronos for Derick Grinsteiner. 1 1 2 3. The motion is denied as to plaintiff’s Interrogatories Numbers 1-3. DATED: September 10, 2019. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?