Harris v. Malakkla et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 11/5/2018 ADOPTING in FULL 30 the Findings and Recommendations; and the 25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Reader, L)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
DAVID D. HARRIS,
6
7
8
No. 2:17-cv-2040 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
N. MALAKKLA, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
12
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
13
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On September 30, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
15
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
16
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff has
17
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 30, 2018, are adopted in full; and
22
2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 25) is denied.
23
24
25
26
DATED: November 5, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?