Harris v. Malakkla et al

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING 43 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 06/03/19 DENYING plaintiff's 42 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID D. HARRIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-2040 JAM DB P

v.

ORDER

N. MALAKKLA, et al.,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 43.) Plaintiff has

23

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 47.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 12, 2019, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 42) is denied.

4
5
6
7

DATED: June 3, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2