Brown v. Sagireddy

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/2018 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after service of these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEXTER BROWN,

12
13
14

No. 2:17-cv-2041 KJM AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

PURUSHOTTAMA SAGIREDDY,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 2, 2018, the District Judge directed plaintiff to submit an

19

application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days. See ECF No. 14. Plaintiff was

20

“cautioned that failure to file a completed in forma pauperis application may result in the

21

dismissal of this action.” Id. at 2. The thirty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not

22

responded to the court’s order.

23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice.

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14)

27

days after service of these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right

2

to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: June 13, 2018

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2