Law v. Austin et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/6/2019 ADOPTING in FULL 32 Findings and Recommendations. Defendants Yee and Austin are DISMISSED from this case. (Reader, L)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
CARLOS GILBERT LAW,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
No. 2:17-cv-2060 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
LORI W. AUSTIN, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
12
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
13
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
14
On November 13, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
15
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
16
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 32. Neither
17
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 13, 2019, are adopted in full; and
22
2. Defendants Yee and Austin are dismissed from this case.
23
24
25
26
DATED: December 6, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?