Sneed v. Kernan, et al.

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/4/2020 ADOPTING 50 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING second amended complaint 47 without leave to amend for failure to comply with the court's order; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNIE KAY SNEED, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-2071 MCE CKD P v. ORDER SCOTT KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2019, are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 47) is DISMISSED without leave to 4 5 amend for failure to comply with the court’s orders; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED: February 4, 2020 8 9 10 11 _______________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?