Sneed v. Kernan, et al.
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/4/2020 ADOPTING 50 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING second amended complaint 47 without leave to amend for failure to comply with the court's order; and The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONNIE KAY SNEED,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2071 MCE CKD P
v.
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On December 12, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2019, are ADOPTED in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 47) is DISMISSED without leave to
4
5
amend for failure to comply with the court’s orders; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: February 4, 2020
8
9
10
11
_______________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?