Barrack v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 5

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/20/17 ORDERING the actions denominated 1:17-CV-01317 LJO-MJS, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD, 2 :17-CV-02051 TLN-AC, 2:17-02053 MCE-DB, 2:17-02079 MCE-GGH, and 2:17-02092 MCE-EFB, be reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

JACOB BERNARD RUSSELL SORENSON and )
BERNARD SORENSON,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
JOHN ZIMMERSCHIED and EVELYN
)
ZIMMERSCHIED,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
PAUL WILLIAMS and MARCELLA
)
WILLIAMS,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, )
inclusive,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
1

Case No. 2:17-CV-01987-JAM-AC
RELATED CASE ORDER
Related to Nos.:
2:17-CV-02078 JAM-AC

Case No. 1:17-CV-01317-LJO-MJS

Case No. 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD

1

JEAN MEJIA MALAGON,

2

Plaintiff,
v.

3
4

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

5

Defendants.
FELIX VILLALOVOS,

6
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

10
11

Defendants.
ANGELA M. LOVEST,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

15
Defendants.
16
17

NELSON CAMARGO,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20

v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10,
inclusive,

21

Defendants.

22
23

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:17-CV-02051 TLN-AC

Case No. 2:17-CV-02053 MCE-DB

Case No. 2:17-CV-02079 MCE-GGH

Case No. 2:17-CV-02092 MCE-EFB

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these

24

actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal.

25

2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge

26

and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of

27

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the

28

parties.
2

1

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

2

Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are

3

assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation

4

of the actions is effected.

5

court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and

6

magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned.

7

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated

Under the regular practice of this

8

1:17-CV-01317 LJO-MJS, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02051 TLN-AC,

9

2:17-02053 MCE-DB, 2:17-02079 MCE-GGH, and 2:17-02092 MCE-EFB, be

10

reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison

11

Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in

12

this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED.

13

caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown

14

as 1:17-CV-01317 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02051 JAM-

15

AC, 2:17-02053 JAM-AC, 2:17-02079 JAM-AC, and 2:17-02092 JAM-AC.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

Henceforth, the

17

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

18

compensate for this reassignment.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 20, 2017

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3