Barrack v. Ford Motor Company

Filing 5

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/20/17 ORDERING the actions denominated 1:17-CV-01317 LJO-MJS, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD, 2 :17-CV-02051 TLN-AC, 2:17-02053 MCE-DB, 2:17-02079 MCE-GGH, and 2:17-02092 MCE-EFB, be reassigne d to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JACOB BERNARD RUSSELL SORENSON and ) BERNARD SORENSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) JOHN ZIMMERSCHIED and EVELYN ) ZIMMERSCHIED, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) PAUL WILLIAMS and MARCELLA ) WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 1 Case No. 2:17-CV-01987-JAM-AC RELATED CASE ORDER Related to Nos.: 2:17-CV-02078 JAM-AC Case No. 1:17-CV-01317-LJO-MJS Case No. 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD 1 JEAN MEJIA MALAGON, 2 Plaintiff, v. 3 4 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 5 Defendants. FELIX VILLALOVOS, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 10 11 Defendants. ANGELA M. LOVEST, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 NELSON CAMARGO, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-CV-02051 TLN-AC Case No. 2:17-CV-02053 MCE-DB Case No. 2:17-CV-02079 MCE-GGH Case No. 2:17-CV-02092 MCE-EFB Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these 24 actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123 (E.D. Cal. 25 2005). Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge 26 and magistrate judge is likely to affect a substantial savings of 27 judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the 28 parties. 2 1 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 2 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that these actions are 3 assigned to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation 4 of the actions is effected. 5 court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and 6 magistrate judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated Under the regular practice of this 8 1:17-CV-01317 LJO-MJS, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-CKD, 2:17-CV-02051 TLN-AC, 9 2:17-02053 MCE-DB, 2:17-02079 MCE-GGH, and 2:17-02092 MCE-EFB, be 10 reassigned to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Allison 11 Claire for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in 12 this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. 13 caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown 14 as 1:17-CV-01317 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02006 JAM-AC, 2:17-CV-02051 JAM- 15 AC, 2:17-02053 JAM-AC, 2:17-02079 JAM-AC, and 2:17-02092 JAM-AC. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make Henceforth, the 17 appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 18 compensate for this reassignment. 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 20, 2017 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?