Hopson v. Aleshmali et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/30/2018 ORDERING this case DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903 7345 South Durango Drive Suite B-107-240 Las Vegas, NV 89113 Telephone: 866-790-2242 Facsimile: 888-802-2440 Electronic Mail: daniel@malakauskas.com Attorney for PLAINTIFF CATHERINE M. CORFEE, SBN 155064 Corfee Stone & Associates, APC P.O. Box 1098 Carmichael, CA 95609 Telephone: 916-487-5441Facsimile: 916-487-5440 Attorney for DEFENDANTS 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 FRESNO DIVISION 15 16 CYNTHIA HOPSON, PLAINTIFF, 17 18 19 Case No.: 2:17-cv-2084-WBSEFB STIPULATED DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. NASR AHMED ALESHMALI, as an 20 individual and doing business as [Fed. R. Civ. P. 41] 21 “Jimmy’s Market”, TIMOTHY J. SPENCER, as an individual and as 22 trustee for The Spencer Family 2015 23 Revocable Trust, LISA M. SPENCER, as an individual and as trustee for The Spencer Family 2015 Revocable Trust, 25 THE SPENCER FAMILY 2015 26 REVOCABLE TRUST, and DOES 110, inclusive, 24 27 28 DEFENDANT. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FERDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) 1 1 ORDER 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action through their designated counsel, that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its 5 6 entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 7 The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees in connection with the lawsuit 8 and the negotiation and preparation of any agreement entered into by such parties. 9 10 Dated: July 30, 2018 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FERDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?