Hopson v. Aleshmali et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/30/2018 ORDERING this case DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
DANIEL MALAKAUSKAS, SBN 265903
7345 South Durango Drive
Suite B-107-240
Las Vegas, NV 89113
Telephone: 866-790-2242
Facsimile: 888-802-2440
Electronic Mail: daniel@malakauskas.com
Attorney for PLAINTIFF
CATHERINE M. CORFEE, SBN 155064
Corfee Stone & Associates, APC
P.O. Box 1098
Carmichael, CA 95609
Telephone: 916-487-5441Facsimile: 916-487-5440
Attorney for DEFENDANTS
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
FRESNO DIVISION
15
16 CYNTHIA HOPSON,
PLAINTIFF,
17
18
19
Case No.: 2:17-cv-2084-WBSEFB
STIPULATED DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
NASR AHMED ALESHMALI, as an
20 individual and doing business as
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 41]
21 “Jimmy’s Market”, TIMOTHY J.
SPENCER, as an individual and as
22 trustee for The Spencer Family 2015
23 Revocable Trust, LISA M. SPENCER,
as an individual and as trustee for The
Spencer Family 2015 Revocable Trust,
25 THE SPENCER FAMILY 2015
26 REVOCABLE TRUST, and DOES 110, inclusive,
24
27
28
DEFENDANT.
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FERDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)
1
1
ORDER
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties in this action
through their designated counsel, that this action be and is hereby dismissed in its
5
6
entirety, WITH PREJUDICE, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
7
The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees in connection with the lawsuit
8
and the negotiation and preparation of any agreement entered into by such parties.
9
10
Dated: July 30, 2018
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FERDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
41(a)(1)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?