Apple Hill Growers v. El Dorado Orchards, Inc. et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/22 DENYING without prejudice 32 Motion to Compel. The case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for a settlement conference. In order to schedule the settlement conference, the parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Cota's courtroom deputy, Christy Pine no later than February 2, 2022 regarding their availability to participate in a settlement conference. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APPLE HILL GROWERS, 12 Plaintiff/CounterDefendant, 13 14 15 v. EL DORADO ORCHARDS, INC., et al., No. 2:17–cv–02085–TLN–CKD ORDER (ECF No. 32) Defendants/CounterClaimants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Apple Hill Growers’ motion to compel discovery from 19 Defendant/Counter-Claimant Mason Visman (ECF No. 32) came on for remote hearing before the 20 undersigned on January 26, 2022. (ECF No. 38.) After discussion with the parties, it was 21 determined that the motion was premature as the parties are just starting to negotiate as to the 22 substance of Mr. Visman’s discovery responses. The parties shall therefore substantively meet 23 and confer in good faith regarding those issues. If these efforts are unsuccessful, the parties may 24 request an informal discovery conference for help resolving issues that do not require full 25 briefing—or must prepare a formal motion to compel that fully outlines the nature of the disputed 26 issues, including each party’s arguments and the discovery requests and responses at issue. See 27 Local Rule 251(c) (detailing contents of joint statement regarding discovery disagreements). 28 //// 1 1 It was also determined that this case would benefit from court-assisted settlement, and 2 after consulting with the assigned District Judge, the parties are now ordered to arrange a 3 settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Dennis Cota as described below. ORDER 4 5 It is HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 32) is DENIED without prejudice. 7 2. The case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for a settlement 8 9 conference. This referral does not affect the scheduling deadlines currently in place. 3. In order to schedule the settlement conference, the parties are directed to contact 10 Magistrate Judge Cota’s courtroom deputy, Christy Pine (cpine@caed.uscourts.gov), 11 no later than February 2, 2022 regarding their availability to participate in a settlement 12 conference at 9:30 AM on Mar. 1, Mar. 2, or Mar 22, 2022. The settlement 13 conference will be conducted remotely by Zoom video conference. Parties are 14 instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the settlement 15 conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. 16 Dated: January 27, 2022 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 19, appl.2085 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?