Apple Hill Growers v. El Dorado Orchards, Inc. et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/27/22 DENYING without prejudice 32 Motion to Compel. The case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for a settlement conference. In order to schedule the settlement conference, the parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Cota's courtroom deputy, Christy Pine no later than February 2, 2022 regarding their availability to participate in a settlement conference. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
APPLE HILL GROWERS,
12
Plaintiff/CounterDefendant,
13
14
15
v.
EL DORADO ORCHARDS, INC., et al.,
No. 2:17–cv–02085–TLN–CKD
ORDER
(ECF No. 32)
Defendants/CounterClaimants.
16
17
18
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Apple Hill Growers’ motion to compel discovery from
19
Defendant/Counter-Claimant Mason Visman (ECF No. 32) came on for remote hearing before the
20
undersigned on January 26, 2022. (ECF No. 38.) After discussion with the parties, it was
21
determined that the motion was premature as the parties are just starting to negotiate as to the
22
substance of Mr. Visman’s discovery responses. The parties shall therefore substantively meet
23
and confer in good faith regarding those issues. If these efforts are unsuccessful, the parties may
24
request an informal discovery conference for help resolving issues that do not require full
25
briefing—or must prepare a formal motion to compel that fully outlines the nature of the disputed
26
issues, including each party’s arguments and the discovery requests and responses at issue. See
27
Local Rule 251(c) (detailing contents of joint statement regarding discovery disagreements).
28
////
1
1
It was also determined that this case would benefit from court-assisted settlement, and
2
after consulting with the assigned District Judge, the parties are now ordered to arrange a
3
settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Dennis Cota as described below.
ORDER
4
5
It is HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 32) is DENIED without prejudice.
7
2. The case is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for a settlement
8
9
conference. This referral does not affect the scheduling deadlines currently in place.
3. In order to schedule the settlement conference, the parties are directed to contact
10
Magistrate Judge Cota’s courtroom deputy, Christy Pine (cpine@caed.uscourts.gov),
11
no later than February 2, 2022 regarding their availability to participate in a settlement
12
conference at 9:30 AM on Mar. 1, Mar. 2, or Mar 22, 2022. The settlement
13
conference will be conducted remotely by Zoom video conference. Parties are
14
instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at the settlement
15
conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms.
16
Dated: January 27, 2022
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
19, appl.2085
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?