Apple Hill Growers v. El Dorado Orchards, Inc. et al

Filing 74

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/21/2022 EXTENDING the Discovery Depositions Deadline to 7/15/2022. All other existing scheduling deadlines, including the deadline for hearing of dispositive motions, remain unchanged.(Perdue, C.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Paul W. Reidl (SBN 155221) Christopher J. Passarelli (SBN 241147) Brett J. Leininger (SBN 329579) DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 1500 First Street, Suite 200 Napa, California 94559 Telephone: (707) 252-7122 Facsimile: (707) 255-6876 preidl@dpf-law.com cpassarelli@dpf-law.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs EL DORADO ORCHARDS INC., et al. R. Michael West (SBN 84336) mwest@saciplaw.com Law Offices of R. Michael West 1922 21ST Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 444-5444 Catherine Ashley Straight (SBN 119339) cstraight@cas-law.com Law Offices of Catherine Ashley Straight 1922 21st Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916)-599-1845 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant APPLE HILL GROWERS 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 23 APPLE HILL GROWERS, Plaintiff, vs. 24 EL DORADO ORCHARDS, INC., et al. 25 Defendants. CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DISCOVERY DEPOSITIONS 26 27 28 STIP EXTENDING DEPOSITION CUTOFF [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD 1 Plaintiff Apple Hill Growers (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Brad Visman, Mason Visman, 2 Kandi Visman, and El Dorado Orchards, Inc., (“Defendants”) (Plaintiff and Defendants 3 collectively “the Parties”) agree and stipulate to a further extension of the deadline for taking 4 discovery depositions beyond the current deadline of June 24, 2022, to July 15, 2022. The Parties 5 request the extension to accommodate the schedules of various witnesses who are unavailable for 6 depositions prior to the current deadline. 7 The Court has ordered three prior extensions of discovery deadlines in this case. On 8 January 7, 2022, Magistrate Judge Delaney approved the Parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 33.1) and 9 extended the deadline for fact discovery from February 28, 2022, to May 2, 2022. (ECF. No. 34). 10 On April 19, 2022, also upon the Parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 54), the Court further extended the 11 deadline for fact discovery to June 3, 2022, and extended the deadline for disclosure of expert 12 witnesses from April 25, 2022, to May 27, 2022. (ECF No. 55). Finally, on June 2, 2022, the 13 Court granted another stipulated request (ECF No. 71) and extended the deadline for the parties to 14 take discovery depositions from June 3, 2022, to June 24, 2022. (ECF No. 72). Respectfully submitted, 15 16 DATED: June 17, 2022 DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 17 By: 20 /s/ Christopher J. Passarelli Paul W. Reidl Christopher Passarelli Brett Leininger Attorneys for El Dorado Orchards, et al. 21 LAW OFFICES OF CATHERINE ASHLEY STRAIGHT 18 19 22 By: 24 /s/ Catherine Ashley Straight Catherine Ashley Straight Attorney for Apple Hill Growers 25 LAW OFFICES OF R. MICHAEL WEST 23 26 By: 27 28 STIP EXTENDING DEPOSITION CUTOFF [PROPOSED] ORDER /s/ R. Michael West R. Michael West Attorney for Apple Hill Growers 2 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD ORDER 1 2 Having the reviewed the Parties’ stipulation, the Court orders as follows: 3 1. 4 5 The deadline for taking discovery depositions beyond the deadline for fact discovery is hereby extended to July 15, 2022. All other existing scheduling deadlines, including the deadline for hearing of dispositive 6 motions, remain unchanged. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: June 21, 2022 10 11 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP EXTENDING DEPOSITION CUTOFF [PROPOSED] ORDER 3 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?