Apple Hill Growers v. El Dorado Orchards, Inc. et al

Filing 99

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/14/2023 SUBSTITUTING Brad Visman, in his role as special administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman in place of deceased Mason Visman as Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. (Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Paul W. Reidl (SBN 155221) Christopher J. Passarelli (SBN 241147) Brett J. Leininger (SBN 329579) DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 1500 First Street, Suite 200 Napa, California 94559 Telephone: (707) 252-7122 Facsimile: (707) 340- 7239 preidl@dpf-law.com cpassarelli@dpf-law.com Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs EL DORADO ORCHARDS INC., et al. R. Michael West (SBN 84336) mwest@saciplaw.com Law Offices of R. Michael West 1922 21ST Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 444-5444 14 Catherine Ashley Straight (SBN 119339) cstraight@cas-law.com Law Offices of Catherine Ashley Straight 1922 21st Street Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916)-599-1845 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant APPLE HILL GROWERS 12 13 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 APPLE HILL GROWERS, 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. 23 EL DORADO ORCHARDS, INC., et al. 24 Defendants. CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE BRAD VISMAN, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN; ORDER Date: Time: Location: 25 26 March 23, 2023 2:00 p.m. Courtroom 2 27 28 JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN 1 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD Plaintiff Apple Hill Growers (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Brad Visman, Kandi Visman, El 1 2 Dorado Orchards, Inc., (“Defendants”), and Brad Visman, as special administrator of the Estate 3 of Mason Visman (Plaintiff and Defendants collectively “the Parties”) hereby make the following 4 joint motion to substitute Brad Visman, in his role as the special administrator of the Estate of 5 Mason Visman for the deceased Mason Visman (“Decedent”) as Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, 6 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). Rule 25(a)(1) provides that, if a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may 7 8 order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by 9 the decedent's successor or representative within 90 days after service of a statement noting the 10 11 death. In support of this Motion, the Movants state as follows: 12 1. Decedent, Mason Visman, an individual Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, died intestate on 13 November 11, 2022. Brad Visman and Kandi Visman, Mason Visman’s parents, are 14 Decedent’s sole identified heirs. 15 2. A suggestion of death was submitted to the Court on November 17, 2022 [ECF 97]. 16 3. Claims in this proceeding brought against and by Mason Visman were not extinguished 17 upon his death. 18 4. An Order For Probate of the Estate Of Mason Charles Visman was entered in the Superior 19 Court Of California, County Of El Dorado, on November 17, 2022. A copy of said Order 20 For Probate is attached as Exhibit A hereto. 21 5. Letters Special Administration were issued in the Probate Court of El Dorado County 22 Superior Court on November 17, 2022, in Case Number 22PR0301, appointing Brad 23 Visman as the special administrator of Decedent Mason Visman’s estate. A copy of the 24 Letters Special Administration is attached as Exhibit B hereto. 25 26 27 28 6. Pursuant to said Letters, Brad Visman has duly qualified and is acting as the Special Administrator of Decedent’s estate. 7. In Brad Visman’s capacity as Special Administrator, Brad Visman is the representative of JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN 2 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD 1 Mason Visman, the deceased original Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff; and, accordingly, the 2 proper party to be substituted for Decedent Mason Visman. 3 8. The Parties note that the Letters Special Administration expire on April 30, 2023. The 4 Parties have agreed to notify the Court promptly of any extension of said Letters, or 5 subsequent appointments of Brad Visman as Administrator of Decedent Mason Visman’s 6 estate. 7 9. The Parties bring this joint motion for substitution of a party, notwithstanding the nature of 8 the instant appointment of Brad Visman, in order to preserve their respective legal claims. 9 Wherefore, it is prayed that this motion be granted and that the proceeding’s caption be 10 modified to substitute “Brad Visman, Special Administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman” for 11 the name of Mason Visman. Respectfully submitted, 12 13 DATED: February 14, 2023 DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY 14 By: 15 16 17 /s/ Christopher J. Passarelli Paul W. Reidl Christopher Passarelli Brett Leininger Attorneys for El Dorado Orchards, et al. 18 19 LAW OFFICES OF CATHERINE ASHLEY STRAIGHT 20 21 22 By: /s/ Catherine Ashley Straight Catherine Ashley Straight Attorney for Apple Hill Growers 23 24 LAW OFFICES OF R. MICHAEL WEST 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ R. Michael West R. Michael West Attorney for Apple Hill Growers JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN 3 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD ORDER 1 2 3 Having the reviewed the Parties’ motion, the Court orders that: 1. Brad Visman, in his role as the special administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman, be 4 substituted in this action for the deceased Mason Visman (“Decedent”) as 5 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1); and 6 7 2. that the proceeding’s caption be modified to substitute “Brad Visman, Special Administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman” for the name of Mason Visman. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: February 14, 2023 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN 4 Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?