Apple Hill Growers v. El Dorado Orchards, Inc. et al
Filing
99
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/14/2023 SUBSTITUTING Brad Visman, in his role as special administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman in place of deceased Mason Visman as Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Paul W. Reidl (SBN 155221)
Christopher J. Passarelli (SBN 241147)
Brett J. Leininger (SBN 329579)
DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY
1500 First Street, Suite 200
Napa, California 94559
Telephone: (707) 252-7122
Facsimile: (707) 340- 7239
preidl@dpf-law.com
cpassarelli@dpf-law.com
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs
EL DORADO ORCHARDS INC., et al.
R. Michael West (SBN 84336)
mwest@saciplaw.com
Law Offices of R. Michael West
1922 21ST Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
Telephone: (916) 444-5444
14
Catherine Ashley Straight (SBN 119339)
cstraight@cas-law.com
Law Offices of Catherine Ashley Straight
1922 21st Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
Telephone: (916)-599-1845
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
APPLE HILL GROWERS
12
13
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
20
APPLE HILL GROWERS,
21
22
Plaintiff,
vs.
23
EL DORADO ORCHARDS, INC., et al.
24
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD
JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
BRAD VISMAN, SPECIAL
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF
MASON VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED
DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF
MASON VISMAN; ORDER
Date:
Time:
Location:
25
26
March 23, 2023
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom 2
27
28
JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON
VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/
COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN
1
Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD
Plaintiff Apple Hill Growers (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Brad Visman, Kandi Visman, El
1
2
Dorado Orchards, Inc., (“Defendants”), and Brad Visman, as special administrator of the Estate
3
of Mason Visman (Plaintiff and Defendants collectively “the Parties”) hereby make the following
4
joint motion to substitute Brad Visman, in his role as the special administrator of the Estate of
5
Mason Visman for the deceased Mason Visman (“Decedent”) as Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,
6
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1).
Rule 25(a)(1) provides that, if a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may
7
8
order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by
9
the decedent's successor or representative within 90 days after service of a statement noting the
10
11
death.
In support of this Motion, the Movants state as follows:
12
1. Decedent, Mason Visman, an individual Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, died intestate on
13
November 11, 2022. Brad Visman and Kandi Visman, Mason Visman’s parents, are
14
Decedent’s sole identified heirs.
15
2. A suggestion of death was submitted to the Court on November 17, 2022 [ECF 97].
16
3. Claims in this proceeding brought against and by Mason Visman were not extinguished
17
upon his death.
18
4. An Order For Probate of the Estate Of Mason Charles Visman was entered in the Superior
19
Court Of California, County Of El Dorado, on November 17, 2022. A copy of said Order
20
For Probate is attached as Exhibit A hereto.
21
5. Letters Special Administration were issued in the Probate Court of El Dorado County
22
Superior Court on November 17, 2022, in Case Number 22PR0301, appointing Brad
23
Visman as the special administrator of Decedent Mason Visman’s estate. A copy of the
24
Letters Special Administration is attached as Exhibit B hereto.
25
26
27
28
6. Pursuant to said Letters, Brad Visman has duly qualified and is acting as the Special
Administrator of Decedent’s estate.
7. In Brad Visman’s capacity as Special Administrator, Brad Visman is the representative of
JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON
VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/
COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN
2
Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD
1
Mason Visman, the deceased original Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff; and, accordingly, the
2
proper party to be substituted for Decedent Mason Visman.
3
8. The Parties note that the Letters Special Administration expire on April 30, 2023. The
4
Parties have agreed to notify the Court promptly of any extension of said Letters, or
5
subsequent appointments of Brad Visman as Administrator of Decedent Mason Visman’s
6
estate.
7
9. The Parties bring this joint motion for substitution of a party, notwithstanding the nature of
8
the instant appointment of Brad Visman, in order to preserve their respective legal claims.
9
Wherefore, it is prayed that this motion be granted and that the proceeding’s caption be
10
modified to substitute “Brad Visman, Special Administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman” for
11
the name of Mason Visman.
Respectfully submitted,
12
13
DATED: February 14, 2023
DICKENSON, PEATMAN & FOGARTY
14
By:
15
16
17
/s/ Christopher J. Passarelli
Paul W. Reidl
Christopher Passarelli
Brett Leininger
Attorneys for El Dorado Orchards, et al.
18
19
LAW OFFICES OF CATHERINE ASHLEY STRAIGHT
20
21
22
By: /s/ Catherine Ashley Straight
Catherine Ashley Straight
Attorney for Apple Hill Growers
23
24
LAW OFFICES OF R. MICHAEL WEST
25
26
27
28
By: /s/ R. Michael West
R. Michael West
Attorney for Apple Hill Growers
JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON
VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/
COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN
3
Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD
ORDER
1
2
3
Having the reviewed the Parties’ motion, the Court orders that:
1. Brad Visman, in his role as the special administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman, be
4
substituted in this action for the deceased Mason Visman (“Decedent”) as
5
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1); and
6
7
2. that the proceeding’s caption be modified to substitute “Brad Visman, Special
Administrator of the Estate of Mason Visman” for the name of Mason Visman.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: February 14, 2023
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE
ADMINISTRATOR OF ESTATE OF MASON
VISMAN FOR THE DECEASED DEFENDANT/
COUNTER-PLAINTIFF MASON VISMAN
4
Case No. 2:17-cv-02085-TLN-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?