Rawat v. Fernandes et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/2018 DENYING 5 Request for Entry of Default and Default Judgment as premature; Within 14 days, Plaintiff shall pay sanctions to the Clerk of Court; Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Conference set for 5/3/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman; Status reports due by 4/26/2018. (Fabillaran, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIRAN RAWAT,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-02100-KJM-KJN (PS)
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TAMMY FERNANDES, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On February 22, 2018, plaintiff failed to appear at the status (pre-trial scheduling)
18
conference. (ECF No. 4.) On the same day, she requested an entry of default and default
19
judgment against defendants. (ECF No. 5.) The court subsequently ordered plaintiff to show
20
cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for her failure to appear. (ECF No. 6.)
21
Plaintiff responded, indicating that she forgot about the status conference, due to illness
22
and her pro se status. (See ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff’s failure to remember is not a sufficient excuse,
23
especially in light of the fact that she filed her default request on the same day she was required to
24
appear at the status conference. Moreover, the court previously warned plaintiff that pro se
25
litigants must comply with the procedural rules of the court. (See ECF No. 3 at 3.)
26
As to plaintiff’s request for entry of default and default judgment (ECF No. 5), it appears
27
that this is a procedurally deficient motion for default judgment. Preliminarily, it is not clear
28
whether plaintiff has properly served defendants in this matter. Furthermore, the Clerk of Court
1
1
has not entered default as to defendants. As such, plaintiff’s request is premature.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1. Plaintiff’s request for entry of default and default judgment (ECF No. 5) is DENIED
4
5
as premature.
2. Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall pay a total of $100 in monetary sanctions
6
to the Clerk of Court, based upon her failure to appear at the February 22, 2018 status
7
(pre-trial scheduling) conference.
8
9
10
11
3. The status (pre-trial scheduling) conference is reset for Thursday, May 3, 2018, at
10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25, before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by
counsel or in person if acting without counsel.
4. On or before April 26, 2018, the parties shall file status reports pursuant to the
12
directions set forth in the court’s October 11, 2017 order setting status conference
13
(ECF No. 3).
14
5. At the May 3, 2018 status conference, plaintiff shall be prepared to discuss, and
15
support with documentation, that defendants have been properly served, as directed in
16
the court’s October 11, 2017 order (ECF No. 3).
17
6. Failure to comply with this order shall constitute grounds for the imposition of
18
additional sanctions, including a potential recommendation that plaintiff’s case be
19
involuntarily dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
20
41(b) and Local Rules 110 and 183(a).
21
22
23
24
7. The Clerk of Court shall provide a copy of the court’s October 11, 2017 order (ECF
No. 3), along with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2018
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?