Elias v. Kinross et al

Filing 76

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/17/22 DENYING 74 Motion for Reconsideration. (Woodworth, M.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12

KEIRON M. ELIAS,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:17-cv-2106 WBS DB

v.

ORDER

J. KINROSS, et al.,
Defendants.

17
----oo0oo----

18
19

The court previously granted in part defendants’ motion

20

for summary judgment.

(Docket No. 73.)

Plaintiff has filed a

21

document entitled “Objections to Courts [sic] Granting of Summary

22

Judgment” (Docket No. 74), which the court will construe as a

23

motion to reconsider under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e).

24

Plaintiff presents no new facts or circumstances which would

25

warrant reconsideration, but instead repeats arguments already

26

raised on summary judgment.

27

WBS GGH, 2009 WL 3584946 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2009) (an

28

unsuccessful party may not use a motion to reconsider “to rehash

See Jackson v. Walker, 2:06-cv-2023

1

1

arguments previously presented” or to present contentions which

2

might have been raised prior to the challenged judgment)

3

(citations omitted).

4

reconsideration (Docket No. 74) is DENIED.

5
6

Accordingly, plaintiff’s request for

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2022

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2