Elias v. Kinross et al
Filing
91
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/27/2023 RELIEVING Defendant from filing a Pretrial Statement and VACATING the 11/13/2023 Pretrial Conference. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEIRON M. ELIAS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-02106 WBS DB P
v.
J. KINROSS, et al.,
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
18
By order filed July 12, 2023, this court directed plaintiff to file a pretrial statement on or
19
before September 20, 2023. By order of the same date, plaintiff was warned that failure to file a
20
pretrial statement could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this action.
21
Plaintiff has not filed a pretrial statement and has not otherwise responded to the court’s order. It
22
is therefore recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
23
16(f); Local Rule 110.
24
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
25
1. Defendant is relieved from filing a pretrial statement.
26
2. The pretrial conference to be conducted on the file is vacated; and
27
////
28
////
1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f); Local Rule 110.
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
8
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
9
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
10
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
11
Dated: September 27, 2023
12
DLB7
elia2106.fpt
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?