Siemens Industry Inc. v. American Heavy Moving and Rigging, Inc.
Filing
7
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/27/17, ORDERING that the hearing on defendant's 5 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 1/25/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. Plaintiff's opposition to be filed on or before 1/11/2018, and defendant's reply to be filed on or before 1/18/2018. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
Marilyn Raia, SBN 072320
E-mail:marilyn.raia@bullivant.com
BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415.352.2700
Facsimile: 415.352.2701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Siemens Industry Inc.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC.,
12
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No.: 2:17-CV-02110-TLN-EFB
vs.
AMERICAN HEAVY MOVING AND
RIGGING, INC.,
Defendant.
16
17
The parties hereby request and stipulate that the Court continue the hearing on
18
defendant’s motion to dismiss the second and third causes of action of plaintiff’s complaint
19
from December 14, 2017 at 2:00 PM to January 25, 2018 at 2:00 PM with plaintiff’s opposition
20
to be filed on or before January 11, 2018 and defendant’s reply to be filed on or before
21
January 18, 2018.
22
DATED: November 21, 2017
23
BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC
24
25
By
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Siemens Industry Inc.
27
28
/s/
Marilyn Raia
///
4835-1486-4214.1
–1–
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
1
DATED: November 21, 2017
2
MULLEN & HENZELL L.L.P.
3
4
By /s/
Jared M. Katz
5
Attorneys for Defendant
American Heavy Moving and Rigging, Inc.
6
7
8
9
SO ORDERED.
10
11
DATED: November 27, 2017
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4835-1486-4214.1
–2–
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?