Henderson v. Unknown

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/13/2020 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall inform the court as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this order within the time specified may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM MARTIN HENDERSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-2121 DB P

v.

ORDER

UNKNOWN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil

17
18

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to this court

19

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On March 6, 2020, the court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty

21

days. (ECF No. 26). More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has neither complied with

22

the court’s order, nor communicated with the court in any way. As a result, within thirty days of

23

the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for

24

failure to prosecute and for failure to obey a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also L.R.

25

110.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of this order,

2

plaintiff shall inform the court as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to

3

prosecute and for failure to obey a court order.

4

Plaintiff is warned that failure to respond to this order within the time specified may result

5

in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

6

Dated: April 13, 2020

7
8
9
10

DLB:13
DB/ORDERS/ORDERS.PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS/hend2121.osc.fac

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2