Duran v. Frauenheim
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/25/2018 ADOPTING 22 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 21 Motion to Stay; and this case is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSE ANTONIO DURAN,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2122 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
SCOTT FRAUENHEIM,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as
19
provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 21, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 22. Petitioner has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 23.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 21, 2018 (ECF No. 22), are adopted in
3
full;
4
2. Petitioner’s motion for stay (ECF No. 21) is denied; and
5
3. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
6
proceedings.
7
DATED: September 25, 2018.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?