K.P. v. Peach Tree Healthcare et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/05/17 GRANTING 8 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and DISMISSES without prejudice Defendant USA; REMANDING CASE to Yuba County Superior Court to continue against the sole remaining Defendant, Kenneth Forsythe. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
K.P. by and through her Guardian Ad
Litem, KERI PARNOW,
Plaintiff,
13
16
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
v.
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-02130-TLN-EFB
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PEACH TREE LINDA, and KENNETH
FORSYTHE, M.D.,
Defendants.
17
18
This case involves a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act and is before the Court on
19
20
Defendant United States of America’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 8.)
21
Defendant seeks to dismiss the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff K.P.
22
(“Plaintiff”) did not exhaust her administrative remedies by filing a claim with the United States
23
Department of Health and Human Services before filing this action. (ECF No. 8-1 at 1.)
24
Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition agreeing to a dismissal without prejudice of
25
Defendant and remanding the action to state court to proceed against Defendant Kenneth
26
Forsythe.1 (ECF No. 9.) Having carefully considered the motion and non-opposition, the Court
27
1
28
The United States determined Kenneth Forsythe was not an employee for the purposes of the Federal Tort
Claims Act and Forsythe is represented by separate counsel. (ECF No. 8-1 at 2 n.2.)
1
1
finds it lacks jurisdiction in light of Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust her administrative remedies and
2
hereby DISMISSES without prejudice Defendant United States of America. This matter is
3
REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Yuba to continue against the sole
4
remaining Defendant, Kenneth Forsythe.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: December 5, 2017
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?