Early Morning, Inc. v. Moreno et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/3/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing not later than 1/12/2018, why this action should not be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute or to comply with the applicable rules and o rders of the Court. Failure to respond to timely respond to this Order will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties. Plaintiff failed to respond to the OSC, and the FAC (ECF No. 7 ) is now consequently STRICKEN. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARLY MORNING, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:17-cv-02150-MCE-AC ORDER ELIUD MORENO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On October 23, 2017, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4) Plaintiff’s 17 18 operative Complaint (ECF No. 1), noticing it for hearing on December 14, 2017. Rather 19 than file an opposition, Plaintiff untimely filed a putative First Amended Complaint 20 (“FAC”) without complying with the strictures of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). 21 As a result, this Court, on December 12, 2017, issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) 22 requiring Plaintiff to advise the Court in writing not later than Friday, December 22, 2017, 23 as to why that FAC should not be STRICKEN. Plaintiff failed to respond to the OSC, and 24 the FAC (ECF No. 7) is now consequently STRICKEN. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Given Plaintiff’s failure to file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition 2 to Defendants’ Motion in violation of Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c) or to 3 comply with this Court’s OSC, the Court hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing 4 not later than January 12, 2018, why this action should not be DISMISSED for failure to 5 prosecute or to comply with the applicable rules and orders of the Court. See Fed. R. 6 Civ. P. Failure to respond to timely respond to this Order will result in dismissal of this 7 action with prejudice upon no further notice to the parties. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 3, 2018 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?