Snowden v. Yule et al

Filing 72

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/2020 DENYING as moot 70 Motion to Compel Discovery. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CURTIS SNOWDEN, III,

12

No. 2:17-cv-2167 TLN AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

M. YULE, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action, has filed a motion

18

to compel discovery on the ground that defendants failed to respond to plaintiff’s discovery

19

requests. ECF No. 70. Defendants responded to the motion with an explanation that plaintiff’s

20

motion was prematurely filed and their responses were timely served. ECF No. 71. Review of

21

the parties’ filings supports defendants’ calculation of the applicable deadlines and their statement

22

that their responses were timely served. Plaintiff did not file a reply to defendants’ response,

23

indicating that he is no longer pursuing this matter.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery,

25

ECF No. 70, is DENIED as moot.

26

DATED: October 9, 2020

27
28