Snowden v. Yule et al

Filing 72

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/9/2020 DENYING as moot 70 Motion to Compel Discovery. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS SNOWDEN, III, 12 No. 2:17-cv-2167 TLN AC P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 M. YULE, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action, has filed a motion 18 to compel discovery on the ground that defendants failed to respond to plaintiff’s discovery 19 requests. ECF No. 70. Defendants responded to the motion with an explanation that plaintiff’s 20 motion was prematurely filed and their responses were timely served. ECF No. 71. Review of 21 the parties’ filings supports defendants’ calculation of the applicable deadlines and their statement 22 that their responses were timely served. Plaintiff did not file a reply to defendants’ response, 23 indicating that he is no longer pursuing this matter. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, 25 ECF No. 70, is DENIED as moot. 26 DATED: October 9, 2020 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?