Khan v. City of Lodi

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/11/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall have an unspecified amount of time to effect service of the complaint on the condition that he notify the court 60 days from the date of this Order, and every 60 days thereafter, of the status of his pending state action; Plaintiff is warned that failure to provide the notices required above may result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MUDDSAR KHAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-02169-MCE-GGH v. ORDER M. HITCHCOCK, Officer, et. al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff appears in this action in pro se and in forma pauperis. On March 14, 2018 the 17 18 court extended plaintiff’s time to effect service of his amended complaint for a period of 30 days. 19 ECF No. 13. At the end of that 30 day period plaintiff sought another extension of time to so 20 serve, but left the time period for the extension he sought open-ended stating that the prosecutor 21 in a state court action still had failed to proceed with trial and plaintiff was unable to determine 22 when that action would proceed. In light of plaintiff’s explanation of the circumstances underlying his request, the court 23 24 will extend time without a final end date upon which service must be effected,1 so long as 25 plaintiff notifies the court every 60 days of the status of the pending state action. Upon notice 26 27 28 1 This relief from the duty to serve the complaint cannot, however, go on endlessly and, at some point, it may become necessary for the court to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute, after giving plaintiff notice and an opportunity to complete service. 1 1 that the state case has been resolved the court will provide service instructions. 2 Good cause appearing therefor IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. Plaintiff shall have an unspecified amount of time to effect service of the 4 complaint in this matter on the condition that he notify the court 60 days from the date of this 5 Order, and every 60 days thereafter, of the status of his pending state action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 2. Plaintiff is warned that failure to provide the notices required above may result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2018 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?