Khan v. City of Lodi
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/11/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall have an unspecified amount of time to effect service of the complaint on the condition that he notify the court 60 days from the date of this Order, and every 60 days thereafter, of the status of his pending state action; Plaintiff is warned that failure to provide the notices required above may result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed with prejudice. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MUDDSAR KHAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-02169-MCE-GGH
v.
ORDER
M. HITCHCOCK, Officer, et. al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff appears in this action in pro se and in forma pauperis. On March 14, 2018 the
17
18
court extended plaintiff’s time to effect service of his amended complaint for a period of 30 days.
19
ECF No. 13. At the end of that 30 day period plaintiff sought another extension of time to so
20
serve, but left the time period for the extension he sought open-ended stating that the prosecutor
21
in a state court action still had failed to proceed with trial and plaintiff was unable to determine
22
when that action would proceed.
In light of plaintiff’s explanation of the circumstances underlying his request, the court
23
24
will extend time without a final end date upon which service must be effected,1 so long as
25
plaintiff notifies the court every 60 days of the status of the pending state action. Upon notice
26
27
28
1
This relief from the duty to serve the complaint cannot, however, go on endlessly and, at some
point, it may become necessary for the court to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute,
after giving plaintiff notice and an opportunity to complete service.
1
1
that the state case has been resolved the court will provide service instructions.
2
Good cause appearing therefor IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
3
1.
Plaintiff shall have an unspecified amount of time to effect service of the
4
complaint in this matter on the condition that he notify the court 60 days from the date of this
5
Order, and every 60 days thereafter, of the status of his pending state action.
6
7
8
9
10
11
2.
Plaintiff is warned that failure to provide the notices required above may result in a
recommendation that this matter be dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 11, 2018
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?