Darnes v. Ellis et al

Filing 11

ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/23/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TAMICA NICOLE DARNES,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-2170 KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN B. ELLIS, et al.,

ORDER & FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed December 13, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

18

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20
21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district
judge to this action; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

27

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
1

1

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

2

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: January 23, 2018

4
5
6
7

Dar2170.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2