Jones v. Fox, et al.
Filing
83
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/01/19 ORDERING plaintiff has filed several documents with the court, including a motion for permanent injunction, a motion for order to show cause, a partial copy of his first amended complaint , a motion to compel discovery, and a request to meet and confer. ECF Nos. 76 , 77 , 78 , 80 , 81 . The court takes noaction on plaintiffs filings as this case is now closed and plaintiffs post-judgment motions for reconsideration 65 , 66 have been denied. ECF No. 82 . Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN JONES,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2190-JAM-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
FOX, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On August 29, 2018, this civil rights case was closed after plaintiff failed to file an
18
amended complaint and judgment was duly entered. ECF Nos. 39, 62, 63. Since then, plaintiff
19
has filed several documents with the court, including a motion for permanent injunction, a motion
20
for order to show cause, a partial copy of his first amended complaint, a motion to compel
21
discovery, and a request to meet and confer. ECF Nos. 76, 77, 78, 80, 81. The court takes no
22
action on plaintiff’s filings as this case is now closed and plaintiff’s post-judgment motions for
23
reconsideration (ECF Nos. 65 & 66) have been denied. ECF No. 82. Plaintiff is hereby informed
24
that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal
25
Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
26
27
28
So ordered.
Dated: April 1, 2019.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?