Canada v. California Medical Facility-Vacaville et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/5/2018 DENYING 11 Request to Dismiss the Present Case. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD LEE CANADA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:17-cv-2192 DB P
ORDER
CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITYVACAVILLE, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a document entitled “Plaintiff
18
19
Request Voluntary Dismiss this Action.” (ECF No. 11.) Therein, plaintiff states that he wishes
20
to dismiss “this action.” Two sentences later, however, plaintiff states that “the only case he
21
would like to continue is Canada vs. J. Lewis case number: 2:17-cv-02192-DB.” Case no. 2:17-
22
cv-2192 DB is the above-captioned action.
The court notes that plaintiff filed an identical request in case no. 2:17-cv-02193 DB.
23
24
That case will be dismissed as plaintiff requested. However, it appears that plaintiff does not, in
25
fact, wish to dismiss this present action. Therefore, plaintiff’s request will be denied. If the court
26
has misinterpreted plaintiff’s intent, plaintiff may file a clarification.
27
////
28
////
1
Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to dismiss the present case (ECF No. 11) is denied.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: January 5, 2018
4
5
6
7
DLB:9
DB/orders/prisoner-civil rights/cana2192.deny dism
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?