Pringle v. Gentry et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/16/18: All dates pending before the undersigned are VACATED. The Motion for to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 12 is now pending before the District Judge assigned to this action. Going f orward, the parties shall conduct pretrial matters, other than discovery motions, before the District Judge assigned to this action. Discovery motions remain referred to the magistrate judge. This matter is REFERRED back to the District Judge assigned to this action. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PAMELA DENISE PRINGLE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-02206 TLN AC

v.

ORDER

AMANDA GENTRY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
This matter was referred to the undersigned for pretrial management by E.D. Cal. R.

17
18

(“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21), because plaintiff was proceeding pro se. On July 13, 2018, counsel

19

Hans W. Herb appeared on behalf of plaintiff. ECF No. 44. Because plaintiff is now represented

20

by counsel, the referral to the undersigned is no longer in effect.

21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

1. All dates pending before the undersigned are VACATED;

23

2. The Motion for to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF No. 12) is now pending

24

before the District Judge assigned to this action.

25

3. Going forward, the parties shall conduct pretrial matters, other than discovery

26

motions, before the District Judge assigned to this action. Discovery motions remain referred to

27

the magistrate judge by Local Rule 302(c)(1).

28

////
1

1

4. This matter is REFERRED back to the District Judge assigned to this action.

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

DATED: July 16, 2018

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2