Pacific Coast Horseshoeing School, Inc. et al v. Grafilo, et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/06/17 ORDERING that Defendants' last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint shall be no later than 12/22/2017. The Parties shall confer as required by FRCP 26(f) and prepare and submit a joint status report that includes the FRCP 26(f) discovery plan by 1/12/2018. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General P. PATTY LI, State Bar No. 266937 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1577 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Patty.Li@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Dean Grafilo and Michael Marion, in their official capacities 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 PACIFIC COAST HORSESHOEING SCHOOL, INC., et al., 14 15 v. 2:17-cv-02217-JAM-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER RE Plaintiffs, EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 16 Judge: The Hon. John A. Mendez Action Filed: October 23, 2017 GRAFILO, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiffs Pacific Coast Horseshoeing School, Inc., Bob Smith, and Esteban Narez 20 21 (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Dean Grafilo, in his official capacity as Director of Consumer 22 Affairs; and Michael Marion, in his official capacity as Chief of the Bureau for Private and 23 Postsecondary Education (“Defendants,” and collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by and 24 through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 25 WHEREAS, on October 23, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint; 26 WHEREAS, on October 24, 2017, Plaintiffs served their Complaint and summons on 27 Defendants; 28 // 1 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-02217-JAM-GGH) 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation (ECF No. 10), the last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint currently is December 12, 2017; WHEREAS, the Parties are engaged in settlement discussions and hope to resolve this matter forthwith; WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Defendants’ time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint shall be extended by 10 days from the stipulated filing deadline; 7 WHEREAS, one previous extension of time has been sought; 8 WHEREAS, the Court’s Order Requiring Joint Status Report (ECF No. 3) provides that the 9 Parties shall confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and prepare and submit a 10 joint status report that includes the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) discovery plan within 11 sixty days of service of the Complaint, which is December 26, 2017; 12 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that: 13 1. 14 15 Defendants’ last day to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint shall be no later than December 22, 2017. 2. The Parties shall confer as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) and 16 prepare and submit a joint status report that includes the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) 17 discovery plan by January 12, 2018. 18 19 Dated: December 6, 2017 Respectfully submitted, XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California TAMAR PACHTER Supervising Deputy Attorney General 20 21 22 23 /s/ P. Patty Li P. PATTY LI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants Dean Grafilo and Michael Marion, in their official capacities 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-02217-JAM-GGH) 1 Dated: December 6, 2017 INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE 2 3 /s/ Keith Diggs KEITH DIGGS Attorney for Plaintiffs 4 5 6 7 HAVING CONSIDERED THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE 8 APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 10 Dated: 12/6/2017 /s/ John A. Mendez___ 11 Hon. John A. Mendez 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order (2:17-cv-02217-JAM-GGH)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?