Pacific Coast Horseshoeing School, Inc. et al v. Grafilo, et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/3/2021 ORDERING Dispositive Motions filed by 10/5/2021, Hearing on such motions shall be on 11/16/2021 at 1:30 PM. Discovery due by 8/20/2021. Disclosure of Expert Witnesses due by 6/18/2021, Supplem ental disclosure and disclosure of any rebuttal expert by 7/20/2021. Final Pretrial Conference Reset for 1/7/2022 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez, and Jury Trial Reset for 2/14/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE KEITH E. DIGGS* PAUL V. AVELAR* 398 S. Mill Ave. #301 Tempe, AZ 85281 Telephone: (480) 557-8300 kdiggs@ij.org pavelar@ij.org *Admitted pro hac vice XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California HEATHER B. HOESTEREY Supervising Deputy Attorney General P. PATTY LI (SBN 266937) Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3817 Patty.Li@doj.ca.gov 10 BENBROOK LAW GROUP, P.C. BRADLEY A. BENBROOK (SBN 177786) STEPHEN M. DUVERNAY (SBN 250957) 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1610 Telephone: (916) 447-4900 brad@benbrooklawgroup.com steve@benbrooklawgroup.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 PACIFIC COAST HORSESHOEING SCHOOL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 18 19 20 21 No. 2:17–CV–02217–JAM–GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES v. KIMBERLY KIRCHMEYER, et al., Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez Action Remanded: July 2, 2020 Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiffs Pacific Coast Horseshoeing School, Inc., Bob Smith, and Esteban Narez 24 (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Kimberly Kirchmeyer, in her official capacity as Director of 25 Consumer Affairs; and Michael Marion, in his official capacity as Chief of the Bureau for Private 26 and Postsecondary Education (“Defendants,” and collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), by 27 and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES (2:17-CV-02217-JAM-GGH) 1 2 WHEREAS, on August 27, 2020, the Court entered a Pre-trial Scheduling Order in this matter (ECF No. 33, “Scheduling Order”); 3 WHEREAS, under the Scheduling Order, the Parties are to disclose expert witnesses by 4 March 21, 2021; disclose rebuttal expert witnesses by April 9, 2021; conclude all discovery by 5 May 28, 2021; and file dispositive motions by July 13, 2021; 6 WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in written discovery, but continue to meet and 7 confer regarding the sufficiency of responses to written discovery and additional areas of 8 discovery, including additional discovery necessary for the Parties to engage expert witness(es) 9 and evaluate their respective claims, defenses, and positions; 10 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that it would be premature to make expert disclosures or file 11 pretrial motions while the Parties continue to engage in good faith in the meet and confer 12 described above; 13 WHEREAS, despite their diligent efforts, disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic 14 have made it more difficult for the Parties to comply with discovery obligations and conduct 15 discovery; and 16 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that an extension to the discovery schedule in this matter is 17 warranted, and that an extension of all deadlines by 12 weeks would not prejudice any of the 18 Parties; 19 THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby stipulated that: 20 1. 21 set forth below. 22 2. 23 With the Court’s approval, the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 33) shall be amended as MOTION HEARINGS SCHEDULES: All dispositive motions shall be filed by October 5, 2021. Hearing on such motions shall be set by the Court. 24 3. DISCOVERY: All discovery shall be completed by August 20, 2021. 25 4. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES: The parties shall make expert witness 26 disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) by June 18, 2021. Supplemental disclosure and 27 disclosure of any rebuttal experts under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(c) shall be made by July 20, 28 2021. 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES (2:17-CV-02217-JAM-GGH) 1 2 5. FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE and TRIAL SETTING: New dates for the final pre-trial conference and jury trial in this matter shall be set by the Court. 3 Respectfully submitted, 4 5 Dated: March 3, 2021 INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE 6 /s/ Keith Diggs KEITH DIGGS Attorney for Plaintiffs 7 8 9 Dated: March 3, 2021 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California HEATHER B. HOESTEREY Supervising Deputy Attorney General 10 11 12 /s/ P. Patty Li P. PATTY LI Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES (2:17-CV-02217-JAM-GGH) 1 ORDER 2 HAVING CONSIDERED THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD 3 CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF NO. 33) IS 4 AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 1. MOTION HEARINGS SCHEDULES: All dispositive motions shall be filed by October 5, 2021. Hearing on such motions shall be on November 16, 2021 at 1:30 PM. 7 2. DISCOVERY: All discovery shall be completed by August 20, 2021. 8 3. DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES: The parties shall make expert witness 9 disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) by June 18, 2021. Supplemental disclosure and 10 disclosure of any rebuttal experts under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(c) shall be made by July 20, 11 2021. 12 13 14 4. FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: The final pre-trial conference is set for January 7, 2022 at 11:00 AM. 5. TRIAL SETTING: Jury trial in this matter is set for February 14, 2022 at 9:00 AM. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 DATED: March 3, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES (2:17-CV-02217-JAM-GGH)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?