Iegorova v. Hobble
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/27/2017 ORDERING 2 that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice; no later than 11/10/2017, plaintiff shall either file a properly-completed amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the applicable filing fee.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:17-cv-2221-GEB-KJN PS
ORDER
BRUCE HOBBLE,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
On October 24, 2017, plaintiff Liudmyla Iegorova, proceeding without counsel, filed the
19
instant action along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) However,
20
plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is incomplete, does not provide all of the
21
requested information, and in many instances simply refers back to some other action that was
22
filed in this court.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED WITHOUT
25
PREJUDICE.
26
2. No later than November 10, 2017, plaintiff shall either file a properly-completed
27
amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the applicable filing fee.
28
3. Failure to timely comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action pursuant
1
1
2
3
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 27, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?