Doutherd v. Montesdeoca, et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/16/2019 GRANTING 78 Motion to Compel; Plaintiff shall provide further responses to UPSFs Request for Production of Documents Number 106(c)-(f), which shall include the production of plaintiffs phone records, by 1/18/2019; and Plaintiff shall provide supplemental response to UPSFs Interrogatory Number 18 and Requests for Admissions Numbers 3-6 by 1/18/2019. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRONE DOUTHERD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-2225-MCE-EFB v. ORDER AFTER HEARING DORIS MARIE MONTESDEOCA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This case was before the court on January 9, 2019, for hearing on defendant UPS Ground 17 18 Freight, Inc.’s (“UPSF”) motion to compel plaintiff to provide further responses to discovery 19 requests. ECF No. 78. Attorney Karen Evans appeared on behalf of defendant UPSF, and 20 attorney Ellen Dove appeared on behalf of plaintiff. 21 For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 22 1. UPSF’s motion to compel further responses to discovery (ECF No. 78) is granted; 23 2. Plaintiff shall provide further responses to UPSF’s Request for Production of 24 Documents Number 106(c)-(f), which shall include the production of plaintiff’s phone records, by 25 January 18, 2019; and 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall provide supplemental response to UPSF’s Interrogatory Number 18 and 2 Requests for Admissions Numbers 3-6 by January 18, 2019. 3 DATED: January 16, 2019. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?