Prater v. Cit Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER 11 extending time for defendant to respond to initial complaint by 12/26/2017, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez for Senior Judge William B Shubb on 12/11/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1 BRYAN CAVE LLP
Merrit M. Jones, California Bar No. 209033
2 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4070
3 Telephone: (415) 675-3400
Facsimile: (415) 675-3434
4 E-Mail:
merrit.jones@bryancave.com
5 Attorneys for Defendant
CIT BANK, N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST BANK FSB
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
8
(SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE)
11 JERRY PRATER,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No.: 2:17-cv-02248-WBS-DB
v.
14 CIT BANK N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST
BANK FSB, SELECT PORTFOLIO
15 SERVICING, INC., AND EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
16
Defendants.
17
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Complaint Filed: October 26, 2017
Trial Date:
Not Assigned
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jerry Prater (“Plaintiff”)
2 and Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. d/b/a OneWest Bank FSB (“Defendant”) (Collectively, the
3 "Parties") by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1.
Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this action on October 26, 2017;
5
3.
The Complaint was served on Defendant on November 3, 2017, and by
6 stipulation, Defendant's deadline to file a response to the Complaint is December 11, 2017;
7
3.
The Parties agree and stipulate that Defendant’s deadline to file a response to
8 the Complaint shall be extended two weeks until and including December 26, 2017; and
9
5.
This stipulated extension will not result in prejudice to any party and it is not
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
10 expected to have any impact on judicial proceedings.
11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12
13
Dated: December 11, 2017
14
C.O. LAW, APC
By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky
Clark Ovruchesky
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JERRY PRATER
15
16
17
18
Dated: December 11, 2017
BRYAN CAVE LLP
19
20
21
22
By: /s/ Merrit M. Jones
Merrit M. Jones
Attorneys for Defendant
CIT BANK, N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST BANK
FSB
23
24 I, Merrit Jones, hereby attest that that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from
25 each of the other Signatories.
26
27
By: /s/
Merrit M. Jones
28
1
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
2
3 Defendant shall have an additional two weeks to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint,
4 through and including December 26, 2017.
5
6
Dated:
By:
/s/ John A. Mendez for William B. Shubb
Judge of the United States District Court
7
8
9
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
1
CERTIFICATE OF CM/ECF SERVICE
2 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
3 document has been served on November 22, 2017, to all counsel of record who are deemed
4 to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Federal Rule
5 of Civil Procedure 5 and Civil Local Rule 135. Any counsel of record who have not
6 consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF system will be served by
7 electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. Pursuant to the
8 Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify
9 that the content of this document is acceptable to Clark Ovruchesky, counsel for Plaintiff,
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
10 and that I have obtained his authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document.
11
12
/s/
Connie Lee
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?