Prater v. Cit Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER 11 extending time for defendant to respond to initial complaint by 12/26/2017, signed by District Judge John A. Mendez for Senior Judge William B Shubb on 12/11/2017. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 BRYAN CAVE LLP Merrit M. Jones, California Bar No. 209033 2 Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-4070 3 Telephone: (415) 675-3400 Facsimile: (415) 675-3434 4 E-Mail: merrit.jones@bryancave.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant CIT BANK, N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST BANK FSB 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 8 (SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE) 11 JERRY PRATER, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No.: 2:17-cv-02248-WBS-DB v. 14 CIT BANK N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST BANK FSB, SELECT PORTFOLIO 15 SERVICING, INC., AND EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., 16 Defendants. 17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: October 26, 2017 Trial Date: Not Assigned 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Jerry Prater (“Plaintiff”) 2 and Defendant CIT Bank, N.A. d/b/a OneWest Bank FSB (“Defendant”) (Collectively, the 3 "Parties") by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 4 1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this action on October 26, 2017; 5 3. The Complaint was served on Defendant on November 3, 2017, and by 6 stipulation, Defendant's deadline to file a response to the Complaint is December 11, 2017; 7 3. The Parties agree and stipulate that Defendant’s deadline to file a response to 8 the Complaint shall be extended two weeks until and including December 26, 2017; and 9 5. This stipulated extension will not result in prejudice to any party and it is not BRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 10 expected to have any impact on judicial proceedings. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 13 Dated: December 11, 2017 14 C.O. LAW, APC By: /s/ Clark Ovruchesky Clark Ovruchesky Attorneys for Plaintiff JERRY PRATER 15 16 17 18 Dated: December 11, 2017 BRYAN CAVE LLP 19 20 21 22 By: /s/ Merrit M. Jones Merrit M. Jones Attorneys for Defendant CIT BANK, N.A. D/B/A ONEWEST BANK FSB 23 24 I, Merrit Jones, hereby attest that that concurrence in this filing has been obtained from 25 each of the other Signatories. 26 27 By: /s/ Merrit M. Jones 28 1 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 2 3 Defendant shall have an additional two weeks to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint, 4 through and including December 26, 2017. 5 6 Dated: By: /s/ John A. Mendez for William B. Shubb Judge of the United States District Court 7 8 9 BRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME 1 CERTIFICATE OF CM/ECF SERVICE 2 The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing 3 document has been served on November 22, 2017, to all counsel of record who are deemed 4 to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Federal Rule 5 of Civil Procedure 5 and Civil Local Rule 135. Any counsel of record who have not 6 consented to electronic service through the Court’s CM/ECF system will be served by 7 electronic mail, first class mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. Pursuant to the 8 Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, I hereby certify 9 that the content of this document is acceptable to Clark Ovruchesky, counsel for Plaintiff, BRYAN CAVE LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070 10 and that I have obtained his authorization to affix his electronic signature to this document. 11 12 /s/ Connie Lee 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?