Andrew et al v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 53

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/3/20 ORDERING that the deadline for the Parties to file final disposition documents shall be extended to August 31, 2020. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DAVID P. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 57721) david@mastagni.com ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245) istevens@mastagni.com MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT A Professional Corporation 1912 “I” Street Sacramento, California 95811-3151 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRIS ANDREW and RICHARD MAYBERRY 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CHRIS ANDREW and RICHARD MAYBERRY, suing individually and by and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:17-cv-02266-JAM-KJN JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS Hon. John A. Mendez CITY OF SACRAMENTO; NATIONWIDE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation; INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION-RETIREMENT CORPORATION, a District of Columbia Company, Defendants. 20 21 As set forth in the Court’s June 21, 2018 Minute Order (Doc. No. 28), Plaintiffs Chris 22 Andrew and Richard Mayberry, and Defendants City of Sacramento (the “City”), Nationwide 23 Investment Services Corporation (“Nationwide”), and International City/County Managers 24 Association-Retirement Corporation (“ICMA RC”) (collectively, “Parties”) reached a settlement 25 in principal during the June 21, 2018 settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Claire. 26 As previously reported to this Court, the Parties’ signed settlement agreement requires 27 independent fiduciary review prior to the Parties’ filing of dispositional documents. 28 independent fiduciary review is not yet complete. The Parties are simply waiting for the fiduciary This JOINT STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS; CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02266-JAM-KJN 1 to complete its review, however events caused by the COVID-19 Pandemic have caused further 2 unanticipated delays. For this reason, the Parties again request that the deadline to file final 3 disposition documents be extended to August 31, 2020, in order to carry out certain terms of the 4 settlement agreement. 5 The June 21, 2018 Minute Order set forth a deadline of September 26, 2018 for the Parties 6 to file final disposition documents. On September 24, 2018, the Parties filed a stipulation 7 requesting the deadline to file final disposition documents be extended to November 16, 2018. 8 (Doc. No. 29). That stipulated request was granted by the Court on September 25, 2018. (Doc. 9 No. 30). On November 15, the Parties filed a second stipulation requesting that the deadline to file 10 final disposition documents be extended to February 22, 2019. (Doc. No. 33). The second 11 stipulated request was granted by the Court on November 16, 2018. (Doc. No. 34). On February 12 20, 2019, the Parties filed a third stipulation requesting that the deadline to file final disposition 13 documents be extended to April 19, 2019. (Doc. No. 35). The third stipulated request was granted 14 by the Court on February 21, 2019. (Doc. No. 36). On April 17, 2019, the Parties filed a fourth 15 stipulation requesting additional time to July 19, 2019. (Doc. No. 37). That stipulation was granted 16 by the Court on April 18, 2019. (Doc. No. 38). On July 18, 2019, the Parties filed a fifth stipulation 17 requesting additional time to August 30, 2019. (Doc. No. 40). That stipulation was granted by the 18 Court on July 19, 2019. (Doc. No. 41). On August 30, 2019, the Parties filed a sixth stipulation 19 requesting additional time to October 16, 2019. (Doc. No. 42). That stipulation was granted by 20 the Court on September 3, 2019. (Doc. No. 43). On October 17, 2019 the Parties filed a seventh 21 stipulation requesting additional time to November 22, 2019. (Doc. No. 44). That stipulation was 22 granted by the Court on October 17, 2019. (Doc. No. 45). On November 25, 2019, the Parties filed 23 an eighth stipulation requesting additional time to December 20, 2019. (Doc. No. 46). That 24 stipulation was granted by the Court on November 25, 2019. (Doc. No. 47). On December 20, 25 2019, the Parties filed a ninth stipulation requesting additional time to March 4, 2020. (Doc. No. 26 48). That stipulation was granted by the Court on December 26, 2020. (Doc. No. 49). On March 27 5, 2020, the Parties filed a tenth stipulation requesting additional time to June2, 2020. (Doc. No. 28 50). That stipulation was granted by the Court on March 5, 2020. (Doc. No. 51). 2 JOINT STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS; CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02266-JAM-KJN 1 Dated: June 3, 2020 2 Respectfully submitted, MAYER BROWN, LLP 3 4 By: /s/ Andrew Z. Edelstein (as authorized 6/3/20) Andrew Z. Edelstein Attorneys for Defendant INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION-RETIREMENT CORPORATION 5 6 7 8 Dated: June 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted, 9 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 10 11 By: /s/ Susannah K. Howard (as authorized 6/3/20) Susannah K. Howard Attorneys for Defendant NATIONWIDE INVESTMENT SERVICES CORPORATION 12 13 14 15 Dated: June 3, 2020 16 Respectfully submitted, MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, APC 17 18 By: /s/ Isaac S. Stevens Isaac S. Stevens Attorneys for Plaintiffs CHRIS ANDREW and RICHARD MAYBERRY 19 20 21 22 Dated: June 3, 2020 Respectfully submitted, BUCHALTER 23 24 25 By: /s/ Kevin T. Collins (as authorized 6/3/20) Kevin T. Collins Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS; CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02266-JAM-KJN 1 2 ORDER 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. The deadline for the Parties to file final disposition documents shall be 4 extended to August 31, 2020. 5 Dated: June 3, 2020 6 /s/ John A. Mendez Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 732117258 JOINT STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS; CASE NO. 2:17-CV-02266-JAM-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?