Sartiaguda v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/4/2018 EXTENDING Time through 7/19/2018, for Defendant to file its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
CAROLYN B. CHEN, CSBN 256628
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17

ALVIN SARTIAGUDA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 2:17-cv-02280-CMK
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME OF 45 DAYS FOR
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective

21

counsel of record, that Defendant shall have an extension of time of 45 additional days to

22

respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The current due date is June 4, 2018. The

23

new due date will be July 19, 2018.

24

This is Defendant’s first request for an extension of time in this case. There is good

25

cause for this request. During the weekend of April 1, 2018, Defendant’s counsel had a serious

26

personal emergency and took multiple days of leave to address and recover from the emergency

27

and continues to take leave intermittently for treatment. Defendant’s counsel is continuing to

28

1

1

address and prioritize the backlog of cases that she could not address while on leave, while also

2

balancing her full workload of district court cases and employment law matters.

3

Thus, Defendant is respectfully requesting additional time up to and including July 19,

4

2018, to fully review the record and research the issues presented by Plaintiff’s motion for

5

summary judgment in this case. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly

6

delay the proceedings.

7
8

Respectfully submitted,
Date: June 1, 2018

LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING

9
s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing by C.Chen*
(As authorized by email on 5/31/2018)
LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
Attorneys for Plaintiff

10
11
12
13

Date: June 1, 2018

14

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
By s/ Carolyn B. Chen
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney

15
16

Attorneys for Defendant

17
18
19
20

ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:

21
22

Dated: June 4, 2018

23
24
25
26
27
28

2