Morris v. CSP-Sacramento et al

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations in full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/12/19 DISMISSING action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ORVILLE M. MORRIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-2286 KJM AC P

v.

ORDER

CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

17
18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided

19

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 16, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations. which

20
21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has not filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

24
25

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed

26

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law

27

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court

28

/////
1

1

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations issued October 16, 2019 (ECF No. 24) are

5

ADOPTED in full.

6
7
8
9

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b).
3. The clerk of court close this case.
DATED: December 12, 2019.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2