Morris v. CSP-Sacramento et al
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations in full signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/12/19 DISMISSING action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ORVILLE M. MORRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-2286 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
CSP-SACRAMENTO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 16, 2019, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations. which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations issued October 16, 2019 (ECF No. 24) are
5
ADOPTED in full.
6
7
8
9
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b).
3. The clerk of court close this case.
DATED: December 12, 2019.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?